0
Vulnerability

Optimizing the Stacking Sequence in Dual-Purpose Body Armors

[+] Author and Article Information
Ian Horsfall

e-mail: i.horsfall@cranfield.ac.uk

Steve M. Champion

Department of Engineering and Applied Science,
Cranfield University,
Shrivenham,
Wiltshire SN6 8LA, UK

Manuscript received June 29, 2012; final manuscript received December 18, 2012; accepted manuscript posted January 9, 2013; published online April 19, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Bo S. G. Janzon.

J. Appl. Mech 80(3), 031901 (Apr 19, 2013) (5 pages) Paper No: JAM-12-1281; doi: 10.1115/1.4023346 History: Received June 29, 2012; Revised December 18, 2012; Accepted January 09, 2013

Many police body armor systems are dual purpose, offering both ballistic and knife resistance by combining a flexible ballistic textile pack with a stiffer knife resistant layer. The two types of protection differ in materials and mechanisms such that each individual component may help or interfere with the function of the other. This paper investigates the effect on knife and ballistic penetration resistance when a single thin metal plate was placed at various different positions within an aramid textile armor pack. Two metallic layers were used: aluminum 7075 and commercial purity titanium; these had similar areal densities and were positioned in the front, middle, and back of a 20 layer pack of woven Kevlar® 49. An instrumented drop weight machine was used to deliver a repeatable knife blade impact at comparable energy levels to those specified in the UK Home Office test standards for knife resistance. Ballistic tests were used to determine the V50 ballistic limit velocity against typical 9 mm and 0.357 Magnum handgun threats. Against a stabbing threat, it was found that positioning the metal plate in the middle of the pack provided the greatest resistance to knife penetration by a factor of almost two, while a plate at the front of the pack provided less resistance and plates positioned at the rear of the pack provided the least resistance to penetration. Against the ballistic threat, the penetration resistance of the textile pack can be significantly improved when a metal plate is at the front of the pack, while for all other positions the effect is negligible. However, this effect is sensitive to both the ammunition type and the metal plate composition. When the metal plate is positioned at the rear of the pack there is a significant decrease in the back-face deformation of the armor pack although, again, this effect is only present for certain ammunition and metal combinations. The overall effect of combining soft and hard elements was that specific performance parameters could be substantially increased by the correct combination. There were no significant negative effects, however, in a number of cases, the combined systems performance was no greater than that of a single element type, despite the added weight.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Bazhenov, S., 1997, “Dissipation of Energy by Bulletproof Aramid Fabric,” J. Mater. Sci., 32(15), pp. 4167–4173. [CrossRef]
Montgomery, T. G., Grady, P. L., and Tomasino, C., 1982, “The Effects of Projectile Geometry on the Performance of Ballistic Fabrics,” Text. Res. J., 52(7), pp. 442–450. [CrossRef]
Walker, J. D., 2001, “Ballistic Limit of Fabrics With Resin,” TB46, Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Ballistics, Interlaken, Switzerland, May 7–11, I. R.Crewther, ed., pp. 1409–1429.
Bhatnagar, A., 2004, “Bullet Deformation Characteristics in a Flexible Ballistic Vest,” Proceedings of the Personal Armour Systems Symposium 2004, Rijswijk, The Netherlands, September 7–10, J. L. M. J.van Bree, ed., pp. 257–268.
Tobin, L. and Iremonger, M., 2006, Modern Body Armour and Helmets: An Introduction (Military Technology Series), Argos, Canberra, Australia, p. 125.
Mamivand, M., and Liaghat, G. H., 2010, “A Model for Ballistic Impact on Multilayer Fabric Targets,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 37(7), pp. 806–812. [CrossRef]
Horsfall, I., 2000, “Stab Resistant Body Armour,” Ph.D. thesis, Cranfield University, UK.
Bottger, C., 2006, “Teijiin Twaron and Hybrids for Soft Body Armour,” Proceedings of the Personal Armour Systems Symposium 2006, Leeds, UK, September 18–22, P.Gotts and R.Horn, eds., pp. 15–21.
Schut, B. M. and Tejani, N., “Tailored Offerings in Kevlar® and Nomex® for the Modern Soldier,” Proceedings of the Personal Armour Systems Symposium 2004, Rijswijk, The Netherlands, September 7–10, J. L. M. J.van Bree, ed., pp. 305–312.
Jacobs, M. J. N., “New Performance Levels With Dyneema® UHMWPE Fibers and Dyneema® Uni-Directional Ballistic Products,” Proceedings of the Personal Armour Systems Symposium 2004, Rijswijk, The Netherlands, September 7–10, J. L. M. J.van Bree, ed., pp. 279–283.
Kevlar Aramid Fibre—Technical Guide, www2.DuPont.com
NATO STANAG 2920 (Ed. 2), 2003, “Ballistic Test Method for Personal Armour Materials and Combat Clothing,” North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
Croft, J., 2007, “HOSDB Body Armour Standards for UK Police (2007),” Part 1–3, Home Office Publication No. 39/07, UK.
ISO/FDIS 14876-2, 2002, “Protective Clothing—Body Armour, Part 2—Ballistic Resistance, Requirements and Test Methods,” International Standards Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
NIJ Standard–0101.06, 2008, “Ballistic Resistance of Body Armor,” National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
Money, M. W. and Sims, G. D., 1989, “Calibration of Quartz Load Cells: An In-Situ Procedure for Instrumented Falling Weight Impact Machines,” Polym. Test., 8(6), pp. 429–442. [CrossRef]
Parker, G., 1993, “Stab Resistant Body Armour Test Procedure,” Police Scientific Development Branch Publication No. 10/93, UK.
Watson, C. H., Horsfall, I., and Robertson, A. M., 1999, “Stacking Sequence Effects in Multi-Purpose Body Armour,” Proceedings Sharp Weapons Armour Technology Symposium, Cranfield University, UK.
Robertson.A. M., 1998, “An Investigation Into Multi-Purpose Body Armour,” Mechanical Engineering Degree Project Report, Cranfield University, UK.
Horsfall, I., Pollitt, S. M., Belk, J. A., and Angood, C., 1995, “Impact Perforation Testing of Stab Resistant Materials,” Impact and Dynamic Fracture of Polymers and Composites, ESIS Vol. 19, J. G.Williams and A.Pavan, eds., Mechanical Engineering Publications, London, UK.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Knife test blade: the UK Home Office no. 5 design [17]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Sectioning the Plastolina® test block to measure the depth of penetration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison of the penetration resistance of the individual armor components

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Force versus displacement graphs of individual components: 20 layer Kevlar® aramid pack, aluminum, and titanium sheets

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effect of the position of the metal plates on knife resistance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effect of the aluminum plate position on knife penetration force

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Perforation of the aluminum plate showing failure: (a) aluminum at the front of aramid, showing the cut edge and brittle crack, (b) aluminum in the middle of aramid, and (c) aluminum at the back of aramid

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Effect of the titanium plate position on knife penetration force

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Perforation of the titanium plate showing failure: (a) titanium at the front of aramid, showing the cut edge, (b) titanium in the middle of aramid, and (c) titanium at the back of aramid

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In