0
Research Papers

Underwater Implosion of Cylindrical Metal Tubes

[+] Author and Article Information
Stephen E. Turner

e-mail: Stephen.e.turner1@navy.mil

Joseph M. Ambrico

e-mail: Joseph.ambrico@navy.mil
Naval Undersea Warfare Center
1176 Howell Street
Bldg 990, Code 4121
Newport, RI 02841

Manuscript received September 13, 2011; final manuscript received May 25, 2012; accepted manuscript posted June 7, 2012; published online October 29, 2012. Assoc. Editor: John Lambros.

This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

J. Appl. Mech 80(1), 011013 (Oct 29, 2012) (11 pages) Paper No: JAM-11-1333; doi: 10.1115/1.4006944 History: Received September 13, 2011; Revised May 25, 2012; Accepted June 07, 2012

The basic physics of the underwater implosion of metal tubes is studied using small scale experiments and finite element simulations. A series of underwater implosion experiments have been conducted with thin-wall aluminum alloy 6061-T6 tubes. The nominal tube dimensions are 2.54 cm outside diameter and 30.48 cm length. Two cylinders collapsed at their natural buckling pressure of 6895 kPa gauge pressure (1000 psig). Two additional cylinders were caused to implode at 6205 kPa gauge pressure (900 psig) using an initiator mechanism. Each of the four cylinders failed with a mode 2 shape (collapsed shape is flat with two lobes). The near field pressure time-history in the water is measured at a radial distance of 10.16 cm (4in.) from the centerline at three points along the cylinder's length. The pressure time-histories show very similar behavior between the cylinders which buckled naturally and those which were mechanically initiated at 90% of the buckling pressure. To aid in understanding the physical implosion phenomena, a computational model is developed with a fluid-structure-interaction finite element code (DYSMAS). This model is validated against the experimental data, and it is used to explain the features of the implosion pressure pulse and how it is physically created.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Rayleigh, Lord, 1917, “On the Pressure Developed in a Liquid During the Collapse of a Spherical Cavity,” Philos. Mag., 34(200), pp.94–98. [CrossRef]
Gilmore, F. R., 1952, “The Growth or Collapse of a Spherical Bubble in a Viscous Compressible Liquid,” Hydrodynamics Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Report No. 26-4.
Hickling, R., and Plesset, M. S., 1964, “Collapse and Rebound of a Spherical Bubble in Water,” Phys. Fluids, 7(1), pp.7–14. [CrossRef]
Plesset, M. S., and Prosperetti, A., 1977, “Bubble Dynamics and Cavitation,” Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 9, pp.145–185. [CrossRef]
Hunter, K. S., and Geers, T. L., 2004, “Pressure and Velocity Fields Produced by an Underwater Explosion,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 115(4), pp.1483–1496. [CrossRef]
Orr, M., and Schoenberg, M., 1976, “Acoustic Signatures From Deep Water Implosions of Spherical Cavities,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 59(5), pp.1155–1159. [CrossRef]
Harben, P., and Boro, C., 2001, “Implosion Source Development and Diego Garcia Reflections,” 23rd Seismic Research Review: Worldwide Monitoring of Nuclear Explosions, pp.23–31.
Vanzant, B. W., Russell, J. E., Schraeder, A. L., and DeHart, R. C., 1967, “Near-Field Pressure Response Due to a Sphere Imploding in Water,” Southwest Research Institute, Summary Technical Report No. 1938-1.
Turner, S. E., 2007, “Underwater Implosion of Glass Spheres,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 121(2), pp.844–852. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wardlaw, A. B., Jr., Luton, J. A., Renzi, J. R., Kiddy, K. C., and Mckeown, R. M., 2003, “The Gemini Euler Solver for the Simulation of Underwater Explosions,” Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian Head Division, Technical Report No. NSWC IHTR 2500.
Collela, P., 1985, “A Direct Eulerian MUSCL Scheme for Gas Dynamics. MUSCL,” SIAM J. Scientific and Statistical Computing, 6, pp.104–117. [CrossRef]
Benson, D. J., 1992, “Computational Methods in Lagrangian and Eulerian Hydrocodes,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 99, pp.235–394. [CrossRef]
Whirley, R., Engelman, B., and Hallquist, J. O., 1993, “Dyna-3D: A Nonlinear, Explicit Three-Dimensional Finite Element Code for Solid Mechanics, User Manual,” Lawrence Livermore National Lab, LLNL Report No. UCRL-MA 107254.
McKirgan, J., 2004, “Characterization of Aluminum 6061-T6 Tube for High Rate Loading Applications,” Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division, Technical Report No. NSWCCD-61-TR-2003/17.
Tillotson, J. H., 1962, “Metallic Equations of State for Hypervelocity Impact,” General Atomics, Technical Report No. GA-3216.
Kyriakides, S., and Netto, T. A., 2000, “On the Dynamics of Propagating Buckles in Pipelines,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 37pp.6843–6867. [CrossRef]
Netto, T. A., and Kyriakides, S., “Dynamic Performance of Integral Buckle Arrestors for Offshore Pipelines. Part I: Experiments,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 42pp.1405–1423. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Test stand shown with mechanical initiator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Sensor locations for all test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Collapsed shape of the cylinder from test 1. Note: the other tests are similar.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Total pressure at the cylinder ends (sensors 1 and 3) and at the middle (sensor 2) in test 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of the pressure from tests 1 and 2 measured at the cylinder middle (sensor 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of the pressure from tests 3 and 4 measured at the cylinder middle (sensor 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Structure model from the coupled DYSMAS simulation of the aluminum cylinder implosion experiments

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Material model fit for 6061-T6 aluminum extruded tube test data [14]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Fluid model from the coupled DYSMAS simulation of the aluminum cylinder implosion experiments showing the boundary conditions on the grid

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of the final collapsed shape from the experiment and from the DYSMAS analysis for test 1. Note that the DYSMAS model has been reflected three times.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Pressure time-histories at the cylinder center (sensor 2) for tests 1 and 2 compared with DYSMAS simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Pressure time-histories at the cylinder center (sensor 2) for tests 3 and 4 compared with the DYSMAS simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Pressure contours from the DYSMAS simulation showing the cylinder during the collapse phase, prior to contact (2000–10,000 kPa contour range)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Pressure contours from the DYSMAS simulation showing the first point of contact reached at center of cylinder (2000–10,000 kPa contour range)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Pressure contours from the DYSMAS simulation when contact reaches the edge of the cylinder in the transverse (Y) direction (2000–20,000 kPa contour range)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Pressure contours from the DYSMAS simulation showing the collapse moving along cylinder axis toward end (2000–20,000 kPa contour range)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Pressure contours from the DYSMAS simulation showing the collapse reaching cylinder end (2000–20,000 kPa contour range)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Pressure time histories from the DYSMAS simulation of tests 1 and 2 at the cylinder center at various standoff distances from the (undeformed) surface of the tube (standoff distances indicated as multiples of the tube radius)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Results from the simulation of tests 1 and 2 for the decay rate of the positive peak implosion pressure with standoff distance from the (undeformed) tube surface, at the center of the cylinder it two directions

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In