Research Papers

Analysis of Thin-Walled Structures With Longitudinal and Transversal Stiffeners

[+] Author and Article Information
E. Carrera

Professor of Aerospace Structures
and Aeroelasticity
e-mail: erasmo.carrera@polito.it

E. Zappino

Ph.D. student
e-mail: enrico.zappino@polito.it

M. Petrolo

Research Assistant
e-mail: marco.petrolo@polito.it
Department of Mechanical
and Aerospace Engineering,
Politecnico di Torino,
Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24,
10129 Torino, Italy

The difference between the EBBT and the higher order solution has been defined as ΔEB%=(wEBBT-w)/|wEBBT|×100.

In the classical models based on displacements degrees of freedom, Θ may be defined as tan(Θ)=ux/z=uz/x, considering Eq. (7) the twisting angle in the CUF formulation can be written as tan(Θx)=ux/z=ux2+xux5+2zux6+,tan(Θz)=uz/x=uz3+2xuz4+zuz5+. This equation shows that the twisting angle is not a property of the whole section but a property of the point, also the equivalence ux/z=uz/x is not automatically satisfied. In order to compare the results with those from literature in this work only the constant term is considered in the evaluation of the twisting angle; therefore θ has been defined as Θ=(arctan(ux2)+arctan(uz3))/2.

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received June 6, 2011; final manuscript received May 7, 2012; accepted manuscript posted June 6, 2012; published online October 29, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Krishna Garikipati.

J. Appl. Mech 80(1), 011006 (Oct 29, 2012) (12 pages) Paper No: JAM-11-1175; doi: 10.1115/1.4006939 History: Received June 06, 2011; Revised May 07, 2012; Accepted June 06, 2012

This paper proposes the use of a one-dimensional (1D) structural theory to analyze thin walled structures with longitudinal and transverse stiffeners. The 1D theory has hierarchical features and it is based on the unified formulation (UF) which has recently been introduced by Carrera. UF permits us to introduce any order of expansion (N) for the unknown displacements over the cross section by preserving the compact form of the related governing equations. In this paper the latter are written in terms of finite element matrices. The same 1D structural theory is used to model a given thin-walled structure composed of stiffened (longitudinal and transverse) and unstiffened parts. It is shown that an appropriate choice of N permits us to accurately describe strain/stress fields of both transverse and longitudinal stiffeners. Comparisons with available results from open literature highlight the efficiency of the proposed model. Moreover, a set of sample problems are proposed and compared with plate/shell formulations from a commercial finite element (FE) software.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Argiris, J. M., and Kelsey, S., 1960, Energy Theorems and Structural Analysis, Butterworths.
Bruhn, E. F., 1973, Analysis and Design of Flight Vehicle Structures, Tri-State Offset Company.
Mustafa, B. A. J., and Ali, R., 1987, “Prediction of Natural Frequency of Vibration of Stiffened Cylindrical Shell and Orthogonally Stiffened Curved Panels,” J. Sound Vib., 113(2), pp.317–327. [CrossRef]
Langley, R. S., 1992, “A Dynamic Stiffness Technique for the Vibration Analysis of Stiffened Shell Structures,” J. Sound Vib., 156(3), pp.521–540. [CrossRef]
Hoppman, W. H., 1958, “Some Characteristics of the Flexural Vibrations of Orthogonally Stiffened Cylindrical Shells,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 30, pp.77–83. [CrossRef]
Mecitoglu, Z., and Dokmeci, C., 1990, “Vibration Analysis of Stiffened Circular Thin Shells,” Proceedings of the International Congress of Aeronautical Sciences Conference ICAS ’90.
Fisher, L., 1954, “Design of Cylindrical Shells With Edge Beams,” ACI J., 274, pp.481–488.
Gibson, J. E., 1968, The Design of Shell Roofs, EFN Spon Ltd, London.
Scordelis, A. C., and Lo, K. S., 1964, “Design of Cylindrical Shells With Edge Beams,” ACI J., 61, pp.539–561.
Kohnke, P. C., and Schnobrich, W. C., 1972, “Analysis of Eccentrically Stiffened Cylindrical Shells,” ASCE J. Struct. Div., 98(7), pp.1493–1510.
Ferguson, G. H., and Clark, R. D., 1979, “A Variable Thickness, Curved Beam and Shell Stiffening Element With Shear Deformations,” Int. J. Numer. Method Eng., 4, pp.581–592. [CrossRef]
Bouberguig, A., and Jirousek, J., 1980, “Calcul par elements finis des coques nervurees et precontraintes,” Proceedings of the International Congress of Aeronautic 2nd International Congress for Numerical Methods for Engineering Sciences Conference ICAS ’90.
Assan, A. E., 1999, “Analysis of Multiple Stiffened Barrel Shell Structures by Strain-Based Finite Elements,” Thin-Walled Struct., 35, pp.233–253. [CrossRef]
Buermann, P., Rolfes, R., Tessmer, J., and Schagerl, M., 2006, “A Semi-Analytical Model for Local Post-Buckling Analysis of Stringer- and Frame-Stiffened Cylindrical Panels,” Thin-Walled Struct., 44, pp.102–114. [CrossRef]
Timoshenko, S. P., and Woinowski-Krieger, S., 1970, Theory of Plate and Shells, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Sokolnikoff, I. S., 1956, Mathematical Theory of Elasticity, McGraw-Hill, New York.
El Fatmi, R., 2007, “Non-Uniform Warping Including the Effects of Torsion and Shear Forces. Part II: Analytical and Numerical Applications,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 44(18–19), pp.5930–5952. [CrossRef]
El Fatmi, R., 2007, “Non-Uniform Warping Including the Effects of Torsion and Shear Forces. Part I: A General Beam Theory,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 44(18–19), pp.5912–5929. [CrossRef]
Berdichevsky, V. L., Armanios, E., and Badir, A., 1992, “Theory of Anisotropic Thin-Walled Closed-Cross-Section Beams,” Composites Eng., 2(5–7), pp.411–432. [CrossRef]
Volovoi, V. V., and Hodges, D. H., 2000, “Theory of Anisotropic Thin-Walled Beams,” J. Appl. Mech., 67, pp.453–459. [CrossRef]
Yu, W., Volovoi, V. V., Hodges, D. H., and Hong, X., 2002, “Validation of the Variational Asymptotic Beam Sectional Analysis (VABS),” AIAA J., 40, pp.2105–2113. [CrossRef]
Schardt, R., 1966, “Eine Erweiterung der Technischen Biegetheorie zur Berechnung Prismatischer Faltwerke,” Der Stahlbau, 35, pp.161–171.
Schardt, R., 1989, Verallgemeinerte Technische Biegetheorie, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Silvestre, N., and Camotim, D., 2002, “First-Order Generalised Beam Theory for Arbitrary Orthotropic Materials,” Thin-Walled Struct., 40(9), pp.791–820. [CrossRef]
Carrera, E., 1995, “A Class of Two Dimensional Theories for Multilayered Plates Analysis,” Atti Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, Memorie Scienze Fisiche, 19–20, pp.49–87.
Carrera, E., 2002, “Theories and Finite Elements for Multilayered, Anisotropic, Composite Plates and Shells,” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 9(2), pp.87–140. [CrossRef]
Carrera, E., 2003, “Theories and Finite Elements for Multilayered Plates and Shells: A Unified Compact Formulation With Numerical Assessment and Benchmarking,” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 10(3), pp.216–296. [CrossRef]
Carrera, E., and Giunta, G., 2010, “Refined Beam Theories Based on a Unified Formulation,” Int. J. Appl. Mech., 2(1), pp.117–143. [CrossRef]
Carrera, E., Giunta, G., Nali, P., and Petrolo, M., 2010, “Refined Beam Elements With Arbitrary Cross-Section Geometries,” Comput. Struct., 88(5–6), pp.283–293. [CrossRef]
Carrera, E., Petrolo, M., and Zappino, E., 2012, “Performance of CUF Approach to Analyze the Structural Behavior of Slender Bodies,” J. Struct. Eng., 138, pp.285–297. [CrossRef]
Carrera, E., Petrolo, M., and Nali, P., 2011, “Unified Formulation Applied to Free Vibrations Finite Element Analysis of Beams With Arbitrary Section,” Shock Vib., 18(3), pp.485–502. [CrossRef]
Carrera, E., and Petrolo, M., 2012, “Refined Beam Elements With Only Displacement Variables and Plate/Shell Capabilities,” Meccanica, 47(3), pp.537–556. [CrossRef]
Carrera, E., and Petrolo, M., 2011, “On the Effectiveness of Higher-Order Terms in Refined Beam Theories,” J. Appl. Mech., 78(2), p. 021013. [CrossRef]
Tsai, S. W., 1988, Composites Design, 4th ed., Think Composites, Dayton, OH.
Reddy, J. N., 2004, Mechanics of Laminated Composite Plates and Shells. Theory and Analysis, 2nd ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Bathe, K., 1996, Finite Element Procedure, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Vlasov, V. Z., 1961, Thin-Walled Elastic Beams, Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem.
Kim, N. I., and Kim, M. Y., 2005, “Exact Dynamic/Static Stiffness Matrices of Non-Symmetric Thin-Walled Beams Considering Coupled Shear Deformation Effects,” Thin-Walled Struct., 43, pp.701–734. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Reference frame of the model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Example of reinforced structures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparisons between model 1 and model 3 of the cross-section deformations at different longitudinal axis positions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Effects of ribs on the warping of the section at y = L/4 from a lateral point of view

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Multicomponent capabilities of CUF 1D models

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

“Very low” aspect ratio beam model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Cross-section displacements (m) at y = L/2. Sixth order theory.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Stress (Pa) distributions at y = L/2, sixth order theory

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Circular cross-section reference system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparisons between model 1 and model 3, 3D view

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Models considered in the bending analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Displacements in the z direction of thin-walled cylinder with an internal pressure. Comparisons between the with-ribs model (case 2) and without-ribs model (case 1). Displacements amplified of a ×100 factor.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Displacements in the z direction of thin-walled cylinder with ribs under an internal pressure load. Comparisons between the with-stringers model (case 4) and without-stringers model (case 2). Displacements amplified of a ×100 factor.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Section displacements of thin-walled cylinder with ribs under an internal pressure load. Section analyzed at y = 7.5. Comparisons between the with-stringers model (case 4) and without-stringers model (case 2). Displacements amplified of a ×100 factor.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

3D view of the displacements of the different models, undeformed in white, amplification factor ×300. (a) Case 1, (b) case 2, (c) case 3, (d) case 4.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Effects of the rib on the percentage gap between higher order theories and EBBT

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Reference system and loads of the C-shaped cross section

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Effects of the ribs on the torsion of a beam with a C-shaped cross section

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Reference system and geometry of the different models. Case 1: only skin; case 2: skin and ribs; case 3: skin and stringers; case 4: skin, stringers, and ribs.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In