0
Research Papers

Simulation of Constrained Mechanical Systems—Part II: Explicit Numerical Integration

[+] Author and Article Information
David J. Braun1

 School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, 10 Crichton Street,Edinburgh EH8 9AB,UKdavid.braun@ed.ac.uk

Michael Goldfarb

Department of Mechanical Engineering,  Vanderbilt University, VU Station B 351592,Nashville, TN 37235michael.goldfarb@vanderbilt.edu

Practically, accuracy of the initial data depends on the accuracy required on the kinematic constraints.

T(q,q·) is the kinetic energy while V(q) denotes the potential energy of the system.

In this paper and in Part I of this work [8] we used tol=10-6 in all examples. Note that computation of (CeNν)+ can also be performed with standard routines that automatically set tol.

The velocity of the center is expressed in the spherical coordinate system (eρ,eα,eβ); eρ=cos(α)cos(β)i+cos(α)sin(β)j-sin(α)k, eα=-sin(α)cos(β)i-sin(α)sin(β)j-cos(α)k, eβ=-sin(β)i+cos(β)j+0k. The position of P can be calculated as rP=rC+i=13XiPei=rC+reρ where XiP are the coordinates of the material point on the ball in contact. By multiplying this last relation (from the left) with eiT one obtains XiP=r(eiTeρ), and subsequently vPC=i=13XiPe·i=i=13r(eiTeρ)e·i.

The initial orientation of the ball is defined as: e1(0)=[1,0,0]T, e2(0)=[0,1,0]T, e3(0)=[0,0,1]T, while the corresponding consistent initial velocities are calculated as e·i(0)=ω(0)×ei(0) where ω(0)=ωρ(0)eρ(0)+((R-r)cos(α(0))/r)β·(0)eα(0)-((R-r)/r)α·(0)eβ(0) and ωρ(0)=1s-1.

The desired motion of the robot is chosen to avoid knee collision and ground collision with the feet such that the necessary smoothness condition on constraints is provided.

1

Corresponding author.

J. Appl. Mech 79(4), 041018 (May 16, 2012) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4005573 History: Received December 11, 2010; Revised October 21, 2011; Posted February 01, 2012; Published May 16, 2012

This paper presents an explicit to integrate differential algebraic equations (DAEs) method for simulations of constrained mechanical systems modeled with holonomic and nonholonomic constraints. The proposed DAE integrator is based on the equation of constrained motion developed in Part I of this work, which is discretized here using explicit ordinary differential equation schemes and applied to solve two nontrivial examples. The obtained results show that this integrator allows one to precisely solve constrained mechanical systems through long time periods. Unlike many other implicit DAE solvers which utilize iterative constraint correction, the presented DAE integrator is explicit, and it does not use any iteration. As a direct consequence, the present formulation is simple to implement, and is also well suited for real-time applications.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Ball of mass m=1 kg and r=1 m rolling in a bowl of radius R=8 m. (a) Stroboscopic view of the rolling motion. (b) Position of the center of the ball (ρ(t), α(t), β(t)). The simulations are performed with 10-2 s time step, through t ∈ [0, 100] s.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

The semilog figures depict the constraint error, energy error, and an overall error measure ɛ=|β·cos(α)2+2r7(R-r)ωρsin(α)-β·(0)cos(α(0))2-2r7(R-r)ωρ(0)sin(α(0))| where ωρ=12∑i=13(ei×e·i)Teρ. Note that, β·cos(α)2+2r7(R-r)ωρ sin(α)=const. is a first integral of the considered nonholonomic system, and accordingly ɛ is identically zero along the exact solution (i.e., ɛ≡0). In the current simulation, Baumgarte’s constrained stabilization is implemented with optimal parameters [10].

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Anthropomorphic biped, with model parameters given in Ref. [28] and ω=πs-1. (a) Stroboscopic plot of the oscillatory motion. (b) Phase plots. The real-time simulation is performed for t  ∈  [0, 100]s with 10-2 s time step, started from (slightly) inconsistent initial conditions: q(0)=[0.056, 1.2, 1.4, 2, 2, 0.35, 1.19, 1.19, 0]T, v(0)=0. (c) The kinematic constraints are precisely satisfied and steadily maintained.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In