0
Research Papers

Kinematic Shakedown Analysis of Anisotropic Heterogeneous Materials: A Homogenization Approach

[+] Author and Article Information
H. X. Li

Department of Civil Engineering,  University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom

J. Appl. Mech 79(4), 041016 (May 11, 2012) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4006056 History: Received March 07, 2011; Revised November 01, 2011; Posted February 21, 2012; Published May 11, 2012; Online May 11, 2012

A nonlinear mathematical programming approach together with the finite element method and homogenization technique is developed to implement kinematic shakedown analysis for a microstructure under cyclic/repeated loading. The macroscopic shakedown limit of a heterogeneous material with anisotropic constituents is directly calculated. First, by means of the homogenization theory, the classical kinematic theorem of shakedown analysis is generalized to incorporate the microstructure representative volume element (RVE) chosen from a periodic heterogeneous or composite material. Then, a general yield function is directly introduced into shakedown analysis and a purely kinematic formulation is obtained for determination of the plastic dissipation power. Based on the mathematical programming technique, kinematic shakedown analysis of an anisotropic microstructure is finally formulated as a nonlinear programming problem subject to only a few equality constraints, which is solved by a generalized direct iterative algorithm. Both anisotropy and pressure dependence of material yielding behavior are considered in the general form of kinematic shakedown analysis. The purely kinematic approach based on the kinematic shakedown analysis has the advantage of less computational effort on field variables and more convenience for displacement-based finite element implementation. The developed method provides a direct approach for determining the reduced macroscopic strength domain of anisotropic heterogeneous or composite materials due to cyclic or repeated loading.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

The macroscopic shakedown domain of the composite (Vf  = 0.2, matrix C)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

The macroscopic shakedown limit and plastic limit of the composite (Vf  = 0.5, matrix A)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

The macroscopic shakedown limit and plastic limit of the composite (Vf  = 0.5, matrix B)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

The macroscopic shakedown limit and plastic limit of the composite (Vf  = 0.5, matrix C)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Periodic microstructures and RVEs of a composite

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

The macroscopic shakedown domain of the composite (Vf  = 0.2, matrix A)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

The macroscopic shakedown domain of the composite (Vf  = 0.2, matrix B)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In