0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Measurement of the Total Energy Release Rate for Cracks in PZT Under Combined Mechanical and Electrical Loading

[+] Author and Article Information
H. Jelitto, G. A. Schneider

Institute of Advanced Ceramics, Hamburg University of Technology, Denickestrasse 15, D-21073 Hamburg, Germany

F. Felten1

Institute of Advanced Ceramics, Hamburg University of Technology, Denickestrasse 15, D-21073 Hamburg, Germany

M. V. Swain

Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sydney, Sydney 2010, Australia

H. Balke

Technische Universität Dresden, Institut für Festkörpermechanik, D-01062 Dresden, Germany

1

Currently at Robert Bosch GmbH, Corporate Sector Research and Aerospace Engineering, Postfach 106050, D-70049 Stuttgart, Germany.

J. Appl. Mech 74(6), 1197-1211 (Mar 19, 2007) (15 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2744027 History: Received April 15, 2004; Revised March 19, 2007

Four-point-bending V-notched specimens of lead zirconate titanate (PZT) poled parallel to the long axis are fractured under conditions of controlled crack growth in a custom-made device. In addition to the mechanical loading electric fields, up to 500Vmm are applied parallel and anti-parallel to the poling direction, i.e., perpendicular to the crack surface. To determine the different contributions to the total energy release rate, the mechanical and the piezoelectric compliance, as well as the electrical capacitance of the sample, are recorded continuously using small signal modulation/demodulation techniques. This allows for the calculation of the mechanical, the piezoelectric, and the electrical part of the total energy release rate due to linear processes. The sum of these linear contributions during controlled crack growth is attributed to the intrinsic toughness of the material. The nonlinear part of the total energy release rate is mostly associated to domain switching leading to a switching zone around the crack tip. The measured force-displacement curve, together with the modulation technique, enables us to determine this mechanical nonlinear contribution to the overall toughness of PZT. The intrinsic material toughness is only slightly dependent on the applied electric field (10% effect), which can be explained by screening charges or electrical breakdown in the crack interior. The part of the toughness due to inelastic processes increases from negative to positive electric fields by up to 100%. For the corresponding nonlinear electric energy change during crack growth, only a rough estimate is performed.

Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Schematic geometrical four-point-bending setup with electromechanical load

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Schematic drawing and photograph of the displacement controlled four-point-bending device. The insertion in the photograph shows the mechanical arrangement to measure the displacement of the upper support. The two V-shaped rods are movably connected by an axis and transfer the displacement of the upper support rollers to the position encoder. The electrical insulation at the high voltage side of the specimen is achieved by a coating with thermoplastics.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Raw data of the load-displacement diagram for poled PZT. Two (out of six) unloading cycles are shown. The measurement is performed with the 5Hz modulation.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Load-displacement curves of Fig. 3, including all six unloading cycles. The dotted “small signal” lines and the displacement are corrected according to Eqs. 1,5 in the Appendix . The starting point on the displacement axis is shifted arbitrarily to the origin (as also shown in Fig. 3).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Schematic load-displacement diagrams for crack advance in ferroelectric PZT. (i) Energies during a complete unloading cycle at crack initiation and after a certain crack advance, (ii) energies during crack growth from (c) to (e) without unloading.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Schematic crack and process zone area. (a) Initial notch. (b) The specimen is loaded to a value just before the crack starts to grow, which creates the frontal process zone. (c) The crack has grown. (d) The specimen is completely unloaded. (e) The crack is loaded again and has grown by an amount Δa. The diagonally hatched area (F) in (e) shows the process zone area of remanently switched domains, corresponding to the crack extension Δa. The vertical arrows indicate tensile stress. The capital letters (A), (C), and (F) correlate to the corresponding areas in Fig. 5. The panels (a) to (e) correspond to the points (a) to (e) in Fig. 5.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Intrinsic toughness for poled PZT without applied electric field. The compliance curve for calculating the energy release rate is fitted for crack extensions between 0mm and 1.5mm. The dashed line represents 12J∕m2.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

(a) Mechanical and (b) piezoelectric compliance as well as (c) capacitance as a function of the crack length for different electric fields and corrected according to Eqs. 1,2. For a better comparison the crack length is used, being the sum of notch depth (between 0.98mm and 1.07mm) and crack extension.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

(a) and (b) Compliances and (c) capacitance as a function of the crack extension for an electric field of 500V∕mm and corrected as described before. The fitted analytical functions are used to differentiate the experimental data with respect to the crack surface area. (For the discontinuity of Cp, see text and compare with Fig. 8).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Measured energy release rates GmV, GeF, and Gp for an electric field of 500V∕mm during stable crack advance

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Intrinsic energy release rates averaged between 0.5mm and 1.5mm crack extension. The linear and parabolic functions shown are valid for the idealized case, i.e., that the derivatives of Cp and CeF are independent of the electric field (see text). The data points are measured with only one sample for each electric field, except for the one at zero field, where two samples are averaged. The open circles connected by the gray line are the sum of all three contributions, where additionally GeF has been set to zero. Thus, actually it is the sum of GmV and Gp.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Fracture resistance curves for external electric fields between −500 and 500V∕mm. The initial increase and also the main level are similar for all fields with the exception of −250V∕mm. Here, the curve proceeds slightly lower than the other ones.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Critical mechanical energy release rates, especially linear contribution (black points) and mechanical work of fracture (open points) for different applied electric fields (−500, 0, and +500V∕mm). The latter energy release rate comprises energies due to linear elastic processes as well as remanent energies.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Comparison of the “intrinsic” mechanical energy release rate GmV (lower curve, as in Fig. 1) with Gcmech (upper curve) including remanent switching processes during crack advance. When calculating the standard deviation for the data points between 0.5mm and 1.5mm crack extension (Fig. 1), which gives a rough estimate for the error of the data, we get for the lower curve around ±1J∕mm2 and for the upper curve about ±10J∕mm2 (the latter number seems a little bit high.)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Schematic arrangement of mechanical compliances of the specimen and the equipment with Cm01⪡Cm⪡Cm02. The parameters dΔ1 as well as dΔ2 are the displacements, belonging to Cm and Cm01. The latter one represents the compliance of the mechanical frame plus the compression compliance of the specimen and Cm02 corresponds to small elastic deformations in the mounting and to inertia effects of the upper movable support.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

Schematic drawing of the mechanical load configuration: (a) bending and compression of the specimen as well as loading of the device, (b) compression of the specimen and loading of the device. The difference (a)−(b) yields the pure bending compliance of the specimen.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 17

(a) Mechanical and (b) piezoelectric compliance measured with the 20∕20mm supports (Fig. 1).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 18

Displacement as a function of the force, measured with equal support distances as in Fig. 1. As described before, this effect corresponds to the compliance of the mechanical support and to the compression of the sample. The zero position on the displacement axis is arbitrary. The slightly different paths for loading and unloading are fitted by the same curve (Eq. 5).

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In