0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Dynamic Failure Behavior of Polycrystalline Alumina Under Impact Loading

[+] Author and Article Information
Guowen Yao

School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing, 400074, China

Zhanfang Liu

Department of Engineering Mechanics, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, China

J. Appl. Mech 74(5), 990-995 (Jan 07, 2007) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2722777 History: Received February 14, 2006; Revised January 07, 2007

Plate impact experiments and impact recovery experiments were performed on 92.93wt.% aluminas using a 100mmdia compressed-gas gun. Free surface velocity histories were traced by a velocity interferometry system for any reflector (VISAR) velocity interferometer. There is a recompression signal in free surface velocity, which shows evidence of a failure wave in impacted alumina. The failure wave velocities are 1.27kms and 1.46kms at stresses of 7.54GPa and 8.56GPa, respectively. It drops to 0.21kms after the material released. SEM analysis of recovered samples showed the transit of intergranular microcracks to transgranular microcracks with increasing shock loading. A failure wave in impacted ceramics is a continuous fracture zone, which may be associated with the damage accumulation process during the propagation of shock waves. Then a progressive fracture model was proposed to describe the failure wave formation and propagation in shocked ceramics. The governing equation of the failure wave is characterized by inelastic bulk strain with material damage and fracture. Numerical simulation of the free surface velocity was performed in good agreement with the plate impact experiments. And the longitudinal, lateral, and shear stress histories upon the arrival of the failure wave were predicted, which present the diminished shear strength and lost spall strength in the failed layer.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Longitudinal, lateral, and shear stresses histories of specimens under shock loading simulated by progressive fracture model

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Plate impact experimental schematic with VISAR

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Free surface velocity profiles showing small recompression for shots 405 and 425

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Free surface velocity profiles of glass monitored by VISAR (9,19-20)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Propagation and interaction of compression, rarefaction and failure waves

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Expanded region of free surface velocity profile showing second small recompression signal from shot 425

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

SEM micrographs of (a) initial and recovered alumina samples under (b) 5.76GPa, and (c) 8.65GPa shock loading

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Schematic of the failure wave and elastic precursor for the conservation of mass, momentum, and energy

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Free surface velocity histories of alumina specimens under shock loading

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In