0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Normality Structures With Thermodynamic Equilibrium Points

[+] Author and Article Information
Q. Yang1

State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering,  Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P. R. Chinayangq@tsinghua.edu.cn

R. K. Wang, L. J. Xue

State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering,  Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P. R. China

The Legendre transforms actually involve a maximization on the strain.

In this paper, Einstein’s summation convention is adopted for repeated indexes. However, if an index range is listed like α in Eq. 12, the index is considered as a free index without the summation convention.

1

Corresponding author.

J. Appl. Mech 74(5), 965-971 (Jan 02, 2007) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2722772 History: Received July 26, 2006; Revised January 02, 2007

Enriched by the nonlinear Onsager reciprocal relations and thermodynamic equilibrium points (Onsager, Phys. Rev., 37, pp. 405–406; 38, pp. 2265–2279), an extended normality structure by Rice (1971, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 19, pp. 433–455) is established in this paper as a unified nonlinear thermodynamic theory of solids. It is revealed that the normality structure stems from the microscale irrotational thermodynamic fluxes. Within the extended normality structure, this paper focuses on the microscale thermodynamic mechanisms and significance of the convexity of flow potentials and yield surfaces. It is shown that the flow potential is convex if the conjugate force increment cannot not oppose the increment of the rates of local internal variables. For the Rice fluxes, the convexity condition reduces to the local rates being monotonic increasing functions with respect to their conjugate forces. The convexity of the flow potential provides the thermodynamic system a capability against the disturbance of the thermodynamic equilibrium point. It is proposed for time-independent behavior that the set of plastically admissible stresses determined by yield conditions corresponds to the set of thermodynamic equilibrium points. Based on that viewpoint, the intrinsic dissipation inequality is just the thermodynamic counterpart of the principle of maximum plastic dissipation and requires the convexity of the yield surfaces.

Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In