Vector J-Integral Analysis of Crack Interaction With Pre-existing Singularities

[+] Author and Article Information
Lifeng Ma

Department of Engineering Mechanics, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, Chinamalf@mail.xjtu.edu.cn

Tian Jian Lu

Department of Engineering Mechanics, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China and Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UKtjlu@mail.xjtu.edu.cn

Alexander M. Korsunsky

Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UKAlexander.korsunsky@eng.ox.ac.uk

J. Appl. Mech 73(5), 876-883 (Nov 21, 2005) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2165243 History: Received June 17, 2005; Revised November 21, 2005

In this paper, the mechanics of a semi-infinite crack interacting with near crack-tip singularities (e.g., dislocations) in two-dimensional solids is investigated using the concept of potential energy release rate. The spontaneous relationship between the crack potential energy release rate and the well-known vector conservative integral Ji(i=1,2) is derived. It is demonstrated that J1 and J2 integrals are equally important in solving crack problems. This allows a more rational criterion to be proposed, based on the criterion of maximum energy release rate, to assess the so-called shielding/amplification effect on the crack tip due to the presence of the singularities. It is shown that the new criterion can not only assess the shielding/amplification effect under pure mode I or mode II remote loading, but also efficiently assess crack-singularity interaction under mixed mode remote loading. Simultaneously, it is found by re-examining the Ji integrals that there exists a simple but universal relation among the three values of the vector Ji integral corresponding separately to the contributions induced from the semi-infinite crack tip, the singularity, and the remote loading. Next, a multi-singularity-crack interaction model is addressed, and the closed-form solution is obtained. Finally, as an example, the problem of a single dislocation interacting with a main crack is solved to demonstrate the validity of the proposed model and the new criterion.

Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Curve Γ: (a) surrounding a whole crack; (b) surrounding a crack tip

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

A semi-infinite crack interacting with multisingularities

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

A two-dimensional body containing a main crack and multisingularities

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Decomposition of multisingularity-crack interaction probelem

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Coordinates of the dislocation-crack system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

(a) Normalized G and KI(t) versus dislocation location angle θ0 under pure KI(∞) remote loading (case 1). (b) Normalized G and KII(t) versus dislocation location angle θ0 under pure KII(∞) remote loading (case 2). (c) Normalized G, KI(t) and KII(t) versus dislocation location angle θ0 under mixed mode remote loading KI(∞)=KII(∞)≠0 (case 3).




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In