0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

The Soret Effect: A Review of Recent Experimental Results

[+] Author and Article Information
Jean K. Platten

 University of Mons-Hainaut, Place du Parc, 20, Mons 7000, Belgium

J. Appl. Mech 73(1), 5-15 (Apr 17, 2005) (11 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1992517 History: Received August 13, 2004; Revised April 17, 2005

In the first part of the paper, we recall what the Soret effect is, together with its applications in science and industry. We emphasize the need to have a reliable data base for the Soret coefficient. Next we review the different techniques to measure the Soret coefficient (elementary Soret cell, beam deflection technique, thermal diffusion forced Rayleigh scattering technique, convective coupling and, in particular, the onset of convection in horizontal layers and the thermogravitational method). Results are provided for several systems, with both negative and positive Soret coefficients, and comparison between several laboratories are made for the same systems. We end with “benchmark” values of the Soret coefficient for some organic liquid mixtures of interest in the oil industry and to which all future new techniques should refer before gaining confidence. We conclude that correct values of the Soret coefficient can be obtained in earth conditions and we deny the need to go to microgravity.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Sketch of an elementary Soret cell

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Sketch of an elementary Soret cell using the beam deflection technique

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Crossing of the beams in the sample (a) and zoom on the fringes (b) in the TDFRS technique

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Variation of the critical Rayleigh number in the Rayleigh-Benard configuration as a function of the separation ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Oscillatory onset of convection at ΔT=1.84°C in the system water (90wt%)−isopropanol(10wt%). Mean temperature: 21°C.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Sketch of the thermogravitational column

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Density profile in the thermogravitational column in the system water (60.88wt%)−ethanol(39.12wt%). Tcold=20°C; Thot=25°C.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Mass expansion coefficient in the system water (60.88wt%)−ethanol(39.12wt%)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Thermal expansion coefficient in the system water (60.88wt%)−ethanol(39.12wt%)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Sketch of the open ended tube (OET) technique for measuring the isothermal diffusion coefficient

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Time variation of the logarithm of the mean tube concentration in the OET

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Time variation of the velocity amplitude in pure ethanol

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Time variation of the velocity amplitude in the system water (60.88wt%)−ethanol(39.12wt%)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In