Discussion: “Applicability and Limitations of Simplified Elastic Shell Equations for Carbon Nanotubes” (, , and , 2004, ASME J. Appl. Mech., 71, pp. 622–631) PUBLIC ACCESS

[+] Author and Article Information
J. G. Simmonds

Department of Civil Engineering,  University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904jgs@virginia.edu

J. Appl. Mech 72(6), 981 (Nov 01, 2005) (1 page) doi:10.1115/1.2040451 History:

I wish to point out that there are equations for the vibration ((1), pp. 259–261) and buckling (2) of elastically isotropic circular cylindrical shells that are as accurate as, but much simpler than, the so-called Exact Flügge Equations (Model III) that the authors use as their standard of comparison for the two sets of approximate equations they analyze, namely, the (simplified) Donnell Equations (Model I) and the Simplified Flügge Equations (Model II). (I use the adjective “so-called” because there is no set of two-dimensional shell equations that is “exact.”) On pp. 225–230 of (1) Niordson presents one possible derivation of the Morley-Koiter equations in terms of midsurface displacements in which the two equations of tangential equilibrium (or motion) are identical to the simplified Donnell equations—that is, the first two of the authors’ Flügge equations (3) with the coefficients of the small parameter (1ν2)(DEhR2) set to zero—whereas the equation of normal equilibrium (or motion) may be obtained from the third Flügge equation by replacing the coefficient of (1ν2)(DEhR2) in brackets by 2R22w+w, where 2=2x2+R22θ2.

A simplified set of buckling equations for an elastically isotropic circular cylindrical shell under uniform axial, torsional, and internal pressure loads may be found in (2) where, as may be seen there from Eqs. (3.25)–(3.29), the equations for buckling of a simply supported cylinder under a uniform axial load or a uniform internal pressure are considerably simpler than the analogous Flügge equations yet free of the defects of the simplified Donnell equations. (A notable feature of these equations is that Poisson’s ratio ν appears only in the combined parameter DEhR2.)

It is also important to point out that these simple, accurate equations have been shown rigorously(3-4) to be as accurate as the Flügge equations for any problem that can be formulated as a variational principle using the Rayleigh quotient. The key is the demonstration that the modified strain-energy density that leads to the Morley-Koiter equations (and their analog for buckling) differs from the strain-energy density of the Flügge equations by terms of relative order hR—terms that are of the same order as the intrinsic errors in the Flügge equations.


Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
This article is only available in the PDF format.






Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In