0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

An Acoustic Model for Wave Propagation in a Weak Layer

[+] Author and Article Information
Michael El-Raheb

 ATK Mission Research, 23052 Alcade Drive, Laguna Hills, CA 92653

J. Appl. Mech 72(5), 744-751 (Feb 07, 2005) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1988367 History: Received December 21, 2004; Revised February 07, 2005

An acoustic model is developed for transient wave propagation in a weak layer excited by prescribed pressure or prescribed acceleration at the boundary. The validity of the acoustic model is investigated for the two excitations. A comparison of transient response from the acoustic model and a 3D axisymmetric elastic model reveals that for prescribed acceleration the acoustic model fails to capture important features of the elastic model even as Poisson ratio ν approaches 12. However for prescribed pressure, the two models agree since shear stress is reduced. For prescribed acceleration adopting the modal approach, the mixed boundary-value problem on the excited boundary is converted to a pure traction problem utilizing the influence method. To validate the elaborate modal approach a finite difference model is also developed.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Acoustic histories from prescribed pressure: —, r=0; ---, r=0.5rp; – – –, r=0.9rp. (a1), (b1) modal; (a2), (b2) finite difference.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Frequency spectra of elastic and acoustic models. (a) Elastic model; (b) acoustic model.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Prescribed motion at footprint. (a) Acceleration; (b) velocity; (c) displacement.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Comparison of elastic and acoustic histories for prescribed acceleration: —, r=0; ---, r=0.5rp; – – –, r=0.9rp. Elastic model: (a1) w(r,0), (b1) σzz(r,0), (c1) σzz(r,h); acoustic model: (a2) w(r,0), (b2) σzz(r,0), (c2) σzz(r,h).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Acoustic histories from prescribed pressure: —, r=0; ---, r=0.5rp; – – –, r=0.9rp. (a) w(r,0;t); (b) p(r,0;t); (c) p(r,h;t).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Acoustic pressure and displacement profiles at z=0 and t=4μs. (a1), (b1) Prescribed acceleration; (a2), (b2) prescribed pressure.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Variation of pmx with acceleration parameters U0 and Δt13. (a1), (b1) z=0; (a2), (b2) z=h.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Effect of Poisson ratio ν on (a) deformation snapshots at t=8μs: (a1) ν=0.470, (a2) ν=0.495; (b) variation of peak stress with ν

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Comparison of analytical and finite volume elastic models: —, r=0.02rp; ---, r=0.5rp; – – –, r=0.96rp. (a1), (b1) w, σzz analytical.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Comparison of w histories from elastic and acoustic models with prescribed pressure: —, r=0; ---, r=0.5rp; – – –, r=0.9rp

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Comparison of σzz histories from elastic and acoustic models with prescribed pressure: —, r=0; ---, r=0.5rp; – – –, r=0.9rp

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In