0
BRIEF NOTES

Discontinuities in the Sensitivity Curves of Laminated Cylindrical Shells

[+] Author and Article Information
Yiska Goldfeld, Izhak Sheinman

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, 32000 Haifa, Israel

J. Appl. Mech 71(3), 418-420 (Jun 22, 2004) (3 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1748341 History: Received August 12, 2002; Revised October 25, 2003; Online June 22, 2004
Copyright © 2004 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Koiter, W. T., 1945, thesis, Delft, Amsterdam, H. J. Paris; Technical Report AFFDL-TR-70-25, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, Feb. 1970 (translated edition).
Arbocz, J., and Hol, J. M. A. M., 1989, “ANILISA—Computational Modules for Koiter’s Imperfection Sensitivity Theory,” Report LR-582, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology.
Arbocz,  J., and Hol,  J. M. A. M., 1990, “Koiter’s Stability Theory in a Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) Environment,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 26(9/10), pp. 945–973.
Donnell, L. H., 1933, “Stability of Thin-Walled Tubes Under Torsion,” NACA TR-479.
Sanders,  J. L., 1963, “Nonlinear Theories for Thin Shells,” Quar. J. Appl. Math., 21(1), pp. 21–36.
Sheinman,  I., and Goldfeld,  Y., 2001, “Buckling of Laminated Cylindrical Shells in Terms of Different Shell Theories and Formulations,” AIAA J., 39(9), pp. 1773–1781.
Simitses, G. J., 1986, An Introduction to the Elastic Stability of Structures, Robert E. Krieger, Malabar, FL.
Sheinman,  I., and Tene,  Y., 1973, “Potential Energy of a Normal Pressure Field Acting on an Arbitrary Shell,” AIAA J., 11(8), p. 1216.
Budiansky, B., and Hutchinson, J. W., 1964, “Dynamic Buckling of Imperfection Sensitive Structures,” Proceedings XI International Congress on Applied Mechanics, Munich, pp. 83–106.
Hutchinson,  J. W., and Budiansky,  B., 1966, “Dynamic Buckling Estimates,” AIAA J., 4(3), pp. 525–530.
Budiansky,  B., and Amazigo,  J. C., 1968, “Initial Post-buckling of Cylindrical Shells Under Hydrostatic Pressure,” J. Math. Phys., 47, pp. 223–235.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Sensitivity b parameter versus Batdorf Z-parameter for simply supported (Nxx=N=0) cylindrical shell under hydrostatic pressure
Grahic Jump Location
Hydrostatic buckling load and sensitivity b parameter versus angle ply for simply supported (Nxx=v=0) cylindrical shell with l/R=3
Grahic Jump Location
Hydrostatic buckling load and sensitivity b parameter versus angle ply for simply supported (Nxx=v=0) cylindrical shell with l/R=10
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Axial buckling load and circumferential wave number versus angle ply for simply supported (v=0) cylindrical shell with l/R=3 (b) Sensitivity a and b parameters versus angle ply for simply supported (v=0) cylindrical shell with l/R=3

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In