0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

The Interface Crack Problem of Bonded Piezoelectric and Elastic Half-Space Under Transient Electromechanical Loads

[+] Author and Article Information
S. A. Meguid, X. Zhao

Engineering Mechanics and Design Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King’s College Road, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada

J. Appl. Mech 69(3), 244-253 (May 03, 2002) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1460910 History: Received March 01, 2001; Revised November 26, 2001; Online May 03, 2002
Copyright © 2002 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Shindo, Y., and Ozawa, E., 1990, “Dynamic Analysis of a Cracked Piezoelectric Material,” Mechanical Modeling of New Electromagnetic Materials, R. K. T. Hsieh, ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 297–304.
Norris,  A. N., 1994, “Dynamic Green’s Functions in Anisotropic Piezoelectric, Thermoelastic and Poroelastic Solids,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 447, pp. 175–186.
Khutoryyansky,  N. M., and Sosa,  H., 1995, “Dynamic Representation Formulas and Fundamental Solutions for Piezoelectricity,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 32, pp. 3307–3325.
Shindo,  Y., Katsura,  H., and Yan,  W., 1996, “Dynamic Stress Intensity Factor of a Cracked Dielectric Medium in a Uniform Electric Fields,” Acta Mech., 117, pp. 1–10.
Narita,  F., and Shindo,  Y., 1998, “Dynamic Anti-Plane Shear of a Cracked Piezoelectric Ceramic,” Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 29, pp. 169–180.
Narita,  F., and Shindo,  Y., 1998, “Scattering of Love Waves by a Surface-Breaking Crack in Piezoelectric Layered Media,” JSME Int. J., Ser. A, 41, pp. 40–48.
Meguid,  S. A., and Wang,  X. D., 1998, “Dynamic Anti-Plane Behavior of Interacting Cracks in a Piezoelectric Material,” Int. J. Fract., 91, pp. 391–403.
Wang,  X. D., 2001, “On the Dynamic Behavior of Interacting Interfacial Cracks in Piezoelectric Media,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 38, pp. 815–831.
Li,  S., and Mataga,  P. A., 1996, “Dynamic Crack Propagation in Piezoelectric Materials. Part 1: Electrode Solution,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 44, pp. 1799–1830.
Li,  S., and Mataga,  P. A., 1996, “Dynamic Crack Propagation in Piezoelectric Materials. Part 2: Vacuum Solution,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 44, pp. 1831–1866.
Chen,  Z. T., and Yu,  S. W., 1997, “Crack Tip Field of Piezoelectric Materials Under Anti-Plane Impact,” Chin. Sci. Bull., 42, pp. 1613–1617.
Chen,  Z. T., and Karihaloo,  B. L., 1999, “Dynamic Response of a Cracked Piezoelectric Ceramic Under Arbitrary Electro-Mechanical Impact,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 36, pp. 5125–5133.
Chen,  Z. T., and Meguid,  S. A., 2000, “The Transient Response of a Piezoelectric Strip With a Vertical Crack Under Electro-Mechanical Impact Load,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 37, pp. 6051–6062.
Wang,  X., and Yu,  S., 2000, “Transient Response of a Crack in a Piezoelectric Strip Subjected to the Mechanical and Electrical Impacts,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 37, pp. 5795–5808.
Shin,  J. W., Kwon,  S. M., and Lee,  K. Y., 2001, “An Eccentric Crack in a Piezoelectric Strip Under Anti-Plane Shear Impact Loading,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 38, pp. 1483–1494.
Wang,  B. L., Han,  J. C., and Du,  S. Y., 2000, “Electroelastic Fracture Dynamics for Multi-layered Piezoelectric Materials Under Dynamic Anti-Plane Shearing,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 37, pp. 5219–5231.
Narita,  F., and Shindo,  Y., 1999, “Scattering of Antiplane Shear Waves by a Finite Crack in Piezoelectric Laminates,” Acta Mech., 134, pp. 27–43.
Narayanan,  G. V., and Beskos,  D. E., 1982, “Numerical Operational Methods for Time-Dependent Linear Problems,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 18, pp. 1829–1854.
Durbin,  F., 1974, “Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transforms: An Efficient Improvement to Duber and Abate’s Method,” Comput. J., 17, pp. 371–376.
Miller,  M. K., and Guy,  W. T., 1966, “Numerical Inversion of the Laplace Transform by Using Jocabi Polynomials,” SIAM (Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.) J. Numer. Anal., 3, pp. 624–635.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Geometric configuration of the problem
Grahic Jump Location
Normalized SIF versus normalized time for various electromechanical loads and the permeable boundary condition
Grahic Jump Location
Normalized SIF versus normalized time for various a/h and the permeable boundary condition
Grahic Jump Location
Effects of loading range on the normalized SIF for the permeable boundary condition
Grahic Jump Location
Normalized SIF versus normalized time for various electromechanical loads and the impermeable boundary condition
Grahic Jump Location
Normalized SIF versus normalized time for various a/h and the impermeable boundary condition
Grahic Jump Location
Effect of loading range on the normalized SIF for the impermeable boundary condition
Grahic Jump Location
Normalized EDIF versus normalized time for various a/h and the impermeable boundary condition
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison between solutions of the permeable and impermeable boundary conditions for a/h=0.2,Dh=0.5, and b=12 h
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison between solutions of the permeable and impermeable boundary conditions for a/h=0.6,Dh=0.5, and b=12 h
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison between solutions of the permeable and impermeable boundary conditions for a/h=1.0,Dh=0.5, and b=12 h

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In