Characterizing Damping and Restitution in Compliant Impacts via Modified K-V and Higher-Order Linear Viscoelastic Models

[+] Author and Article Information
E. A. Butcher

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK 99775-5905

D. J. Segalman

Sandia National Laboratories,1 P.O. Box 5800, MS 0847, Albuquerque, NM 87185-0847

J. Appl. Mech 67(4), 831-834 (Feb 10, 2000) (4 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1308578 History: Received August 25, 1998; Revised February 10, 2000
Copyright © 2000 by ASME
Topics: Damping , Force
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Yigit,  A. S., Ulsoy,  A. G., and Scott,  R. A., 1990, “Dynamics of a Radially Rotating Beam With Impact, Part 1: Theoretical and Computational Model,” ASME J. Vibr. Acoust., 112, pp. 65–70.
Brach, R. M., 1991, Mechanical Impact Dynamics: Rigid Body Collisions, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Brogliato, B., 1996, Nonsmooth Impact Mechanics: Models, Dynamics, and Control, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Hunt,  K. H., and Crossley,  F. R. E., 1975, “Coefficient of Restitution Interpreted as Damping in Vibroimpact,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 42, pp. 440–445.
Herbert,  R. G., and McWhannell,  D. C., 1977, “Shape and Frequency Composition of Pulses From an Impact Pair,” J. Eng. Ind., 99, pp. 513–518.
Lee,  T. W., and Wang,  A. C., 1983, “On the Dynamics of Intermittent-Motion Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 105, pp. 534–540.
Khulief,  Y. A., and Shabana,  A. A., 1987, “A Continuous Force Model for the Impact Analysis of Flexible Multibody Systems,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 22, No. 3, pp. 213–224.
Luo,  H., and Hanagud,  S., 1998, “On the Dynamics of Vibration Absorbers With Motion-Limiting Stops,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 65, pp. 223–233.
Mills,  J. K., and Nguyen,  C. V., 1992, “Robotic Manipulator Collisions: Modeling and Simulation,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 114, pp. 650–659.
Haddad, Y. M., 1995, Viscoelasticity of Engineering Materials, Chapman and Hall, New York.
Nayfeh, A. H., 1981, Introduction to Perturbation Techniques, John Wiley and Sons, New York.


Grahic Jump Location
Restitution coefficients for the half-period K-V and Maxwell models (dotted), modified K-V (solid), and standard linear impact model (numerical results) where η=0.0 (solid), 0.05 (long-dashed), 0.2 (short-dashed), and 0.4 (short-long-dashed)
Grahic Jump Location
Hysteresis diagrams for the Kelvin-Voigt (solid), Maxwell (dotted), and standard linear impact models with ωn=1 and ζ=0.1 where η=0.0 (solid), 0.05 (long-dashed), 0.2 (short-dashed), and 0.4 (short-long-dashed). The modified K-V and standard linear models omit the tension at the conclusion of the restitution phase of impact.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In