0
TECHNICAL BRIEFS

Timoshenko Beam Theory Is Not Always More Accurate Than Elementary Beam Theory

[+] Author and Article Information
J. W. Nicholson, J. G. Simmonds

Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va.

J. Appl. Mech 44(2), 337-338 (Jun 01, 1977) (2 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3424048 History: Received October 01, 1976; Revised January 01, 1977; Online July 12, 2010

Abstract

A counterexample involving a homogeneous, elastically isotropic beam of narrow rectangular cross section supports the assertion in the title. Specifically, a class of two-dimensional displacement fields is considered that represent exact plane stress solutions for a built-in cantilevered beam subject to “reasonable” loads. The one-dimensional vertical displacement V predicted by Timoshenko beam theory for these loads can be regarded as an approximation to either the exact vertical displacement v at the center line, or a weighted average of v over the cross section, or a quantity defined to make the virtual work of beam theory equal to that of plane stress theory. Regardless of the interpretation of V and despite the presence of an adjustable shear factor, Timoshenko beam theory for this class of problems is never more accurate than elementary beam theory.

Copyright © 1977 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In